|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Strategic
decisions & Working Capital (WC)
|
|
|
|
Investment
decisions |
|
Modes of diversification
: |
|
Inter-Organizational relationships
: |
|
|
|
Others : |
|
|
Long-Term
Financial decisions |
|
|
|
Investment
analysis and decision |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LEASING
With a leasing
contract the lessor (manufacturer, or specialised
leasing company, often attached to a bank)
undertakes to supply
the lessee with the use
of a piece of equipment during a precise period
of time. Leasing companies or bank subsidiaries
do not maintain an inventory of equipment.
They only purchase equipment which is immediately
leased, thus acting as pure financial intermediaries
between the manufacturer and the user.
The important clauses in the
contract concern the definition of the leased
item, the amount of the payments, the length
of the lease and the disposal of the equipment
at the end of the lease. The length of the
contract, of course, cannot exceed the economic
life of the item in question.
The following types of end-of-contract
clauses could be stipulated:
- restore the item to its owner
- option to acquire the item at a predetermined
price
- sign a new lease contract for the item
Such clauses only have a meaning
if there is some residual value leftover at
the end of the contract.
If a new more efficient or better
adapted model of equipment appears on the
market, then the lessor will have the right
to trade in the old equipment and lease a
new one.
A principal advantage of leasing
is protection against the risk of obsolescence
the cost of which - included in the lease
payments - is, nevertheless, assumed by the
lessee, even though the manufacturer is often
responsible for this state of affairs. Another
advantage of leasing is a higher quality of
service (repairs, and technical assistance)
assuming that the lessor maintains the equipment.
Maintenance is not always included
in the cost of the lease. In this case, the
lessee will be obliged to conclude a maintenance
contract for the duration of the leasing period.
A
leasing contract constitutes a means of financing
: instead of paying the purchase price of
an item up front, the lessor agrees to make
periodic lease payments. Thus the lessee,
in effect, contracts a debt which is equal
to the sum of the lease payments. It can be
concluded, therefore, that leasing is a form
of debt financing.
Example :
Purchase price of an equipment
: 2.000,000 €
Length of contract (irrevocable) : 5 years
Lease payment due at year end : 550,000 €
Market interest rate : 7.5 %
Maintenance included in lease payment
In order to simplify the calculation,
we will assume that lease payments are annual
and due at year end. In reality, such payments
are typically monthly or quarterly due at
the beginning of the period. We will also
assume that the length of the lease corresponds
exactly to the economic life of the equipment.
Hence, there is no residual value. In fact,
in the case of bank financing, the debt is
serviced at the end of the period. (reimbursement
and interest).
The cost of leasing
(r)
2,000,000 |
= |
550,000 |
+ |
550,000 |
+ |
550,000 |
+ |
550,000 |
+ |
550,000 |
(1+r)1 |
(1+r)2 |
(1+r)3 |
(1+r)4 |
(1+r)5 |
Resultat :
r =
11,65 %
At a rate
of 11.65 %, the present value of lease payments
is equal to the purchase price of the equipment
which is 2,000,000. In this case, the lease
contract adds up to a financing which costs
11.65 % per year.
This difference
between the market interest rate of 7,5 %
and the cost of leasing of 11,65 % is justified
to the extent that the lessor offers additional
services besides financing (maintenance, repairs,
the possibility of exchanging the equipment
in case of obsolescence, technical assistance,
etc).
Calculation of the
lease premium
This extra cost embedded in
a lease contract, called the lease premium,
can be calculated by decomposing the lease
payment into two distinct parts : first, the
elements linked to servicing the debt and,
secondly, the rest which constitutes the lease
premium.
If we wish to isolate
the elements linked to the lessor's financing,
we must consider that the company would have
obtained the same financing at a rate of 7.5%
for the 2'000'000 € borrowed.
PV
of payments |
= |
550,000 |
+ |
550,000 |
+ |
550,000 |
+ |
550,000 |
+ |
550,000 |
(1,075)1 |
(1,075)2 |
(1,075)3 |
(1,075)4 |
(1,075)5 |
PV of payments = 2'225'237 €
In signing the contract, the
company agrees to make annual payments of
€ 550,000 during 5 years, or a total
sum of €. 2,750,000. Nevertheless, the
company could have borrowed at a rate of 7.5
%.
If the company had made the
same payments with an effective interest rate
of 7.5%, it would have been able to borrow
€ 2'225'237 instead of only €
2,000,000, as allowed by the contract for
five payments of € 550,000.
Thus, we can conclude that
this leasing contract is the equivalent of
a borrowing of € 2,000,000 at 7.5 %
over 5 years, plus an additional beginning
payment to the lessor of € 225,237,
which constitutes the lease premium.
Decomposing
lease payments
If the company borrows €
2,000,000 at 7,5 % instead of contracting
a leasing, the annuity (interest + reimbursement)
will be calculated as follow :
2,000,000
(PV) |
= |
Annuity |
+ |
Annuity |
+ |
Annuity |
+ |
Annuity |
+ |
Annuity |
(1,075)1 |
(1,075)2 |
(1,075)3 |
(1,075)4 |
(1,075)5 |
Formula :
Annuity
|
=
|
PV
|
.
|
i |
(1 -r-n) |
The amount of the annuity
(service of the debt) is
€ 494,329,37. As the
company pays € 550,000 each year, the
lease premium year by year contained
in the lease payment is € 55,670,63.
The advantage of this approach is to identify
the lease premium year by year instead of
only at the beginning of the contract, as
demonstrated above.
|
Service
of the debt |
Lease
premium |
Year |
Debt |
Interest |
Reimbursement |
Annuity |
Premium |
PV
of premium |
1 |
2,000,000,00 |
150,000,00 |
344,329,37 |
494,329,37 |
55,670,63 |
51,786,63
|
2 |
1,655,670,63 |
124,175,30 |
370,154,07 |
494,329,37 |
55,670,63 |
48,173,61 |
3 |
1,285,516,56 |
96,413,74 |
397,915,63 |
494,329,37 |
55,670,63 |
44,812,66
|
4 |
887,600,94 |
66,570,07 |
427,759,30 |
494,329,37 |
55,670,63 |
41,686,20 |
5 |
459,841,64 |
34,488,12 |
459,841,25 |
494,329,37 |
55,670,63 |
38,777,86 |
6 |
Total |
471,647 |
2,000,
000 |
2,471,647 |
|
225,237 |
Accounting
In most of companies lease payments
are charged to the account "Lease"
as a full expense. But, as demonstrated above,
if we consider the leasing contract as a mean
of financing, the lease payment contains three
things : an interest, a reimbursement and
a premium. Consequently, the equipment leased
must be added to the fixed asset and the debt
contracted must be added to the Long term
Debts.
Balance
sheet |
31.12. |
Total of Current Assets |
680 |
Property & Equipment |
2639 |
Equipment
leased |
2000 |
Total of Assets |
5319 |
Current Liabilities |
619 |
LT Debts |
1050 |
LT
Debt (leasing) |
2000 |
Common Stock |
1100 |
Retained Earnings |
550 |
Total Owners' Equity |
1650 |
Total Liabilities
& Equity |
5319 |
Accounting of the first lease
payment of € 550,000,00 :
Accounts
to be debited |
Accounts
to be credited |
Debit |
Credit |
Interest expense |
- |
150,000,00 |
- |
LT
Debt (leasing) |
- |
344,329,37 |
- |
- |
Bank |
- |
494,329,37 |
Depreciation |
Equipment leased |
344,329,37 |
344,329,37 |
Lease expense |
Bank |
55,670,63 |
55,670,63 |
This method, which should be
applied by every company, has the advantage
to decompose the lease payment in three type
of expenses : (available for the first lease
payment)
Interest expense |
150,000,00 |
Lease expense |
55,670,63 |
Depreciation |
344,329,37 |
Total of lease payment |
550,000,00 |
With this method many
key financial indicators will be different
: Debt/Equity ratio, WACC, Risk, etc
(c) ECOFINE.COM, Bernard Jaquier,
Professor in Economics & Finance, Lausanne, Switzerland, 2018
|
|
|